Home news First people detained under ‘one in, one out’ deal before being sent back to France – UK politics live | Politics

First people detained under ‘one in, one out’ deal before being sent back to France – UK politics live | Politics

by wellnessfitpro

Yvette Cooper says first migrants have been detained under ‘one in, one out’ deal, prior to being sent back to France

Migrants who arrived in the UK after crossing the English Channel have been detained under the new “one in, one out” deal, PA Media reports. PA says:

The first detentions came as people arrived in Dover on Wednesday, the first day the pilot scheme came into force.

Pictures showed the migrants wearing life jackets disembarking from Border Force boats.

The Home Office said detentions began for those who arrived on Wednesday afternoon and they will be held in immigration removal centres until they are returned to France.

Home secretary Yvette Cooper said: “Yesterday, under the terms of this groundbreaking new treaty, the first group of people to cross the Channel were detained after their arrival at Western Jet Foil and will now be held in detention until they can be returned to France.

“That sends a message to every migrant currently thinking of paying organised crime gangs to go to the UK that they will be risking their lives and throwing away their money if they get into a small boat.”

Migrants being brought in to the Border Force compound in Dover from a Border Force vessel following a small boat incident in the Channel yesterday.
Migrants being brought in to the Border Force compound in Dover from a Border Force vessel following a small boat incident in the Channel yesterday. Photograph: Gareth Fuller/PA
Share

Updated at 

Key events

Brown suggests review should consider future of pension triple lock

In his Today programme interview, Gordon Brown was repeatedly asked by Amol Rajan if he favoured keeping the pension triple lock (which is widely seen by experts as overly-generous to pensioners – although the main political parties are terrified of the electoral consequences of saying they will get rid of it). Brown largely avoided the question, saying that it would not be reasonable to comment on one welfare measure without reviewing the whole system, but he end up saying a review would be a good idea. Responding to Rajan’s question, Brown said:

You’re now asking me to go into the whole area of welfare expenditure. And if I were to do that, I would have a complete review of that …

I‘m not going to say, look, let’s take this one measure at the expense of others. Let’s look at it as a whole …

If you want to look at the future of pensions, then I think you’ve got other review on it, as we did about 20 years ago, and came up with some conclusions. It probably is right to have that kind of review for the future, but not to cherry pick one measure against another.

Brown also refused to say whether he thought it was sensible for Labour to rule out raising income tax, national insurance or VAT in its election manifesto last year. When first asked if this was a good idea, he just said it was a manifesto commitment. When asked if it was a “wise” commitment, he laughed briefly, and said that the plan he was proposing, for gambling taxes to fund the abolition of the two-child benefit cap (see 9.14am), did not break the manifesto commitments.

Share

#people #detained #deal #France #politics #live #Politics

You may also like

Leave a Comment