Burnham says Britain needs ‘wholesale change’ – as he urges Starmer to show he has plan to achieve this
Andy Burnham, the Greater Manchester mayor, has said that Britain needs “wholesale change” – implying that Keir Starmer has yet to show how Labour will deliver this.
He was speaking in an interview with the New Statesman in which he dismissed reports that he is actively plotting to replace the PM. At the same time he set out his personal, and more radical, policy platform.
Burnham said that his experience in Greater Manchester had taught him the importance of public ownership of utilities. “Public control is everything,” he told Tom McTague, the New Statesman’s editor, who has written the 7,000-word interview.
With some Labour MPs despairing of the party’s electoral prospects under Starmer, there has been speculation that he could be replaced by Burnham, who has higher approval ratings than any of his potential rivals in the party.
Burnham told McTague that reports claiming he was in talks with Manchester MPs who might stand down to allow him to replace them in a byelection, or that he was planning to criticise Starmer at the party conference, were wrong.
But Burnham also made it clear that he thought the government could be doing better. He said:
To me, the issue of the conference is not who is the deputy leader of the party, who is the leader of the Labour party. The issue for the conference is: where is our plan to turn the country around?
He also said:
It’s the plan that matters most, rather than me. Can we agree on a plan to turn this country around by retaking control of those essentials and being bold about it, and then helping to reduce the cost of living for people and helping control public spending as a result?
Burnham said that what was needed was not just “a changing of the guard”. Instead, the “whole culture” had to be transformed.
I’m going to put the question back to people at Labour conference: are we up for that wholesale change? Because I think that’s what the country needs.
McTague says Burnham refers to his political philosophy as “Manchesterism” and McTague sums it up like this.
Burnham describes his “Manchesterism” as neither Blue Labour nor soft left, Blairite nor Brownite, but a form of consensual, business-friendly socialism that seeks to retake public control of all essential services, from housing to transport, in order to make life “doable” for those trapped in the insecure world of Britain’s outsourced Serco economy. Such radical change is necessary, Burnham argues, to bring back the kind of social mobility he and his generation once enjoyed, whose foundation, he believes, was the public provision of life’s essentials.
McTague also quotes Burnham as describing his approach as “aspirational socialism”.
Burnham said he saw public control of utilities as essential. He told McTague:
If you’ve not got control of housing, you’ve not got control of the costs the country is facing …
The break up of the essentials, to me, is a big reason why the country is in the mess that it’s in. Because when you’ve lost control of housing, energy, water, rail, buses, you’ve lost control of the basics of life, but you’ve also then lost control of costs and public spending.
McTague said other aspects of the Burnham agenda included support for proportional representation (“the idea of a government elected on a minority of the vote is untenable,” Burnham said), an overhaul of asylum policy, less deference to Donald Trump, and what Burnham calls “a stronger argument about Brexit having been a mistake”.
Key events
Corbyn says ‘sorry for confusion’ caused by Sultana row as Your Party opens to members and set date for 1st conference
Jeremy Corbyn has announced that the new leftwing party he is founding, provisionally called Your Party, is now formally open to people who want to become members.
It has also announced that it will have its founding conference in Liverpool at the end of November.
In a video for supporters, Corbyn said he was “sorry for the confusion in getting to this point” – a reference to the row between his supporters and Zarah Sultana, who at one time was described, with Corbyn, as a co-leader of the enterprise.
The party has also invited the 750,000 people who expressed an interest in supporting the new organisation when it launched earlier this year to sign up as proper members.
In an email to the 750,000 people who expressed an interest in supporting the new organisation when it launched in the summer, Your Party said:
Today, we’re delighted to announce the next steps in this process, starting with the opening of our official membership portal …
Today we can share another exciting announcement with you: the founding conference will be held at Liverpool ACC on Saturday 29 and Sunday 30 November.
A total of 13,000 members will debate and amend the party’s founding documents in person across two days, with 6,500 attending each day. To make this conference as representative as possible, attendees will be chosen by lottery, ensuring a fair balance of gender, region and background.
But whether you’re selected as a delegate or not, you’ll have the final say, with final votes and internal elections decided by all members through a secure, online one-member-one-vote system. To be involved, you first have to be a member.
The email included a link to a YouTube video in which Corbyn said that he was excited about the prospect of creating a party that would “fight prejudice, campaign for peace, act against climate breakdown and deliver social justice”.
Corbyn did not mention Sultana in the video, but he did twice refer to their row, which at one point threatened to torpedo the whole project. As well as saying he was sorry about the confusion, at another point he said:
We’ve had some fraught days in the last week, as you will no doubt be very aware. And to be honest, we haven’t covered ourselves in glory.
But what is most important is this: We all agree about the plans for the conference and the road map to get to it.
Corbyn also insisted that he and the other Independent Alliance MPs involved in the project would not be taking charge after the conference. He said:
Once the party is established at the conference, the role that I and other Independent Alliance MPs have been playing to get it off the ground will end.
Our role is not to run the party, not to control it, not to direct it. It is merely to steward the founding of the party that will belong to the grassroots, to the members, who will make the key decisions and elect a leadership through one member, one vote.
While Corbyn and Sultana have to some extent patched up their relationship since the public row, it is not clear what role she will play in the party as it moves ahead.
Burnham says Britain needs ‘wholesale change’ – as he urges Starmer to show he has plan to achieve this
Andy Burnham, the Greater Manchester mayor, has said that Britain needs “wholesale change” – implying that Keir Starmer has yet to show how Labour will deliver this.
He was speaking in an interview with the New Statesman in which he dismissed reports that he is actively plotting to replace the PM. At the same time he set out his personal, and more radical, policy platform.
Burnham said that his experience in Greater Manchester had taught him the importance of public ownership of utilities. “Public control is everything,” he told Tom McTague, the New Statesman’s editor, who has written the 7,000-word interview.
With some Labour MPs despairing of the party’s electoral prospects under Starmer, there has been speculation that he could be replaced by Burnham, who has higher approval ratings than any of his potential rivals in the party.
Burnham told McTague that reports claiming he was in talks with Manchester MPs who might stand down to allow him to replace them in a byelection, or that he was planning to criticise Starmer at the party conference, were wrong.
But Burnham also made it clear that he thought the government could be doing better. He said:
To me, the issue of the conference is not who is the deputy leader of the party, who is the leader of the Labour party. The issue for the conference is: where is our plan to turn the country around?
He also said:
It’s the plan that matters most, rather than me. Can we agree on a plan to turn this country around by retaking control of those essentials and being bold about it, and then helping to reduce the cost of living for people and helping control public spending as a result?
Burnham said that what was needed was not just “a changing of the guard”. Instead, the “whole culture” had to be transformed.
I’m going to put the question back to people at Labour conference: are we up for that wholesale change? Because I think that’s what the country needs.
McTague says Burnham refers to his political philosophy as “Manchesterism” and McTague sums it up like this.
Burnham describes his “Manchesterism” as neither Blue Labour nor soft left, Blairite nor Brownite, but a form of consensual, business-friendly socialism that seeks to retake public control of all essential services, from housing to transport, in order to make life “doable” for those trapped in the insecure world of Britain’s outsourced Serco economy. Such radical change is necessary, Burnham argues, to bring back the kind of social mobility he and his generation once enjoyed, whose foundation, he believes, was the public provision of life’s essentials.
McTague also quotes Burnham as describing his approach as “aspirational socialism”.
Burnham said he saw public control of utilities as essential. He told McTague:
If you’ve not got control of housing, you’ve not got control of the costs the country is facing …
The break up of the essentials, to me, is a big reason why the country is in the mess that it’s in. Because when you’ve lost control of housing, energy, water, rail, buses, you’ve lost control of the basics of life, but you’ve also then lost control of costs and public spending.
McTague said other aspects of the Burnham agenda included support for proportional representation (“the idea of a government elected on a minority of the vote is untenable,” Burnham said), an overhaul of asylum policy, less deference to Donald Trump, and what Burnham calls “a stronger argument about Brexit having been a mistake”.
Home Office defends paying resettlement grants worth up to £1,500 to foreign offenders being deported
But the Home Office has defended that arrangement that means foreign offenders who are being deported can get a resettlement grant. This was highlighted by an ITV report that said foreign offenders were receiving up to £2,000. The Home Office says the grants, which are handed over in the form of a pre-paid card, are at most worth £1,500 per person.
The Home Office says the grants are offered to give people an incentive to cooperate with the facilitated return scheme. Without these grants, offenders are more likely to appeal against deportation, leading to higher costs for the government.
A Home Office spokesperson said:
We understand that the public does not want to see financial handouts to individuals who have no legal right to remain in the UK. However, the reality is that offering incentives for voluntary departure is significantly more cost-effective than detaining individuals or them remaining in the UK while they pursue lengthy legal challenges against removal.
This approach has been in place in the UK since 2006, and it is one adopted by governments around the world due to its practicality and efficiency.
Home Office orders review of spending on taxis for use by asylum seekers
Shabana Mahmood, the home secretary, has ordered a review into the use of taxis by asylum seekers who need to travel to and from appointments.
As the BBC reports, the review was triggered by revelations in a File on 4 report about conditions in asylum hotels. In her report, Sue Mitchell spoke to “one asylum seeker who told us he had taken a 250-mile journey to visit a GP, with the driver telling him the cost to the Home Office was £600”.
Mitchell said her reporting suggested the number of taxi journey being taken by asylum seekers was “extraordinary”. She said:
There seems to be a constant stream of cabs arriving and leaving the four sites I visit – although the Home Office says it doesn’t have figures for the amount of money it spends on taxis at asylum hotels.
While residents are issued with a bus pass for one return journey per week, for any other necessary travel – for example, a visit to the doctor – taxis are called.
Proof of an upcoming appointment needs to be shown at the reception desk, where a taxi is booked on an automated system. Public transport or walking is not presented as an option.
This can result in some unusually long journeys and others that are unusually short.
For instance, when migrants move between hotels, they sometimes keep the same NHS doctors – especially for GP referrals. Kadir says a knee problem meant he was told to take a 250-mile taxi ride to see the consultant who had treated him at his old address. He says the taxi driver told him the return journey cost £600.
Streeting says it’s ‘dangerous and irresponsible’ for Farage to imply Trump might be right about paracetamol risk
Wes Streeting, the health secretary, has described Nigel Farage over his comment implying Donald Trump might be right about paracetamol posing a risk to pregnant women. (See 10.23am.)
Dangerous and irresponsible.
This man is a snake oil salesman and it’s time people stopped buying.
UK’s YouTube and TikTok content creators deserve more rights, say MPs
A new cross-party group of MPs and peers is demanding more rights for Britain’s growing army of online content creators, amid concerns they face obstacles in securing everything from basic equipment to mortgages, Michael Savage reports.
‘Racist, sexist, misogynistic and Islamophobic’ – Sadiq Khan hits back at Trump
Sadiq Khan, the Labour mayor of London, has hit back at Donald Trump after the US president yesterday accused him of introducing sharia law in the capital.
In an interview with Sky News, Khan said that he felt he “appeared to be living rent-free in Donald Trump’s head”. He suggested that Trump’s antipathy towards him was related to the fact that he is “a Muslim man who leads a liberal, multicultural, progressive, successful city”.
Asked if he thought Trump’s comments were Islamophobic, Khan replied:
When people say things, when people act in a certain way, when people behave in a certain way, you’ve got to believe them.
Asked if that meant he was saying Trump was Islamophobic, Khan replied:
I think President Trump has shown he is racist, he is sexist, he is misogynistic, and he’s Islamophobic.
Khan suggested record numbers of Americans were coming to London because they wanted to escape Trump’s America.
And he suggested that Keir Starmer should be more willing to challenge Trump over areas where they did not agree. Asked if he was unhappy about the effort Starmer was making to befriend Trump, Khan said:
One of the things about having a special relationship, it’s akin to having a best friend. I think when you have a best friend, you should expect more from them ..
One of the advantages of having a special relationship with the USA is obviously, when it comes to trade, when it comes to military alliances, when it comes to other areas, we work closely together.
But it should also mean you’ve got the confidence to call them when they’re wrong. I think President Trump is wrong in many, many ways.
Royal Parks says there’s no evidence to back Farage’s claim their swans being eaten by migrants
The Royal Parks have rejected a claim from Nigel Farage that migrants are killing and eating swans from their grounds.
The Reform UK leader made the assertion in his LBC interview this morning as he deflected a question about whether Donald Trump was wrong last year when he claimed migrants in Ohio were eating dogs and cats. Trump’s comment was widely dismissed as a racist slur.
The LBC Nick Ferrari asked Farage about the Trump claim in an interview a year ago and Farage said that, when Trump said something like this, there was normally some basis of truth behind it. He bet Ferrari £10 that within a month or so evidence would emerge to prove Trump right.
Today Ferrari challenged Farage to pay up, on the grounds that one year on Trump has still not been able to prove that he was telling the truth.
But Farage refused, saying he would only give Ferrari his £10 if he could prove that Trump was wrong.
He went on:
If I said to you that swans were being eaten in royal parks and carps were being taken out of ponds and eaten in this country from people with different cultures. Would you agree that is happening?
Asked who was doing this, Farage said “people who come from countries where it’s quite acceptable to do so”. Asked if he meant eastern Europeans, he replied: “So I believe.”
A Royal Parks spokesperson said:
We’ve not had any incidents reported to us of people killing or eating swans in London’s eight Royal Parks.
Our wildlife officers work closely with the Swan Sanctuary to ensure the welfare of the swans across the parks.
Claims that swans have been eaten by migrants have been periodically surfacing in British newspapers for years. But the reports almost never include compelling proof, and in recent years the police have not caught anyone in connection with these allegations.
Cabinet Office says government has saved £480m using AI data tools to crack down on fraud
The Cabinet Office says it has saved £480m by using AI data tools in what it describes as “the government’s biggest ever fraud crackdown”. In a news release it says:
Over a third of the money saved (£186m) comes from identifying and recovering fraud committed during the Covid-19 pandemic. Government efforts to date have blocked hundreds of thousands of companies with outstanding or potentially fraudulent Bounce Back Loans from dissolving before they would have to pay anything back. We have also clawed back millions of pounds from companies that took out Covid loans they were not entitled to, or took out multiple loans when only entitled to one …
Alongside Covid fraud, the record savings reached in the year to April 2025 include clamping down on people unlawfully claiming single persons council tax discount and removing people from social housing waitlists who wanted to illegally sublet their discounted homes at the taxpayers’ expense.
A council-owned hotel has cancelled a launch event for a new political party backed by right-wing activist Tommy Robinson and the billionaire Elon Musk, PA Media reports. PA says:
Advance UK, led by former Reform deputy Ben Habib, was due to hold a conference in Newcastle on Saturday.
The new party announced the event last month without revealing the venue but it was understood to have been planned to be held at the Crowne Plaza hotel in the city centre.
In a social media post last month, the party said it had chosen Newcastle, “the symbolic heart of Brexit” and vowed that it “will fight unapologetically for sovereignty, free speech, and restoring pride in our nation”.
Following an online protest, the hotel management has cancelled the booking “on health and safety grounds”, Newcastle city council said.
Lib Dems accuse Farage of following ‘Trump’s dangerous anti-science agenda’
The Liberal Democrats have condemned Nigel Farage for his comments about Donald Trump, paracetamol and autism. (See 10.23am.) Helen Morgan, the Lib Dem health spokesperson, said:
Nigel Farage wants to impose Trump’s dangerous anti-science agenda here in the UK. Peddling this kind of nonsense is irresponsible and wrong.
It seems Farage would rather see pregnant women suffer in pain than stand up to his idol Donald Trump.
Ed Davey, the Lib Dem leader, devoted much of his party conference speech yesterday to attacking Farage. Asked about the speech, Farage told LBC this morning that he thought Davey was suffering from “Farage derangement syndrome”. He went on:
[Davey] didn’t tell the country what he was for. Just what he’s against, which is me and Trump. And he doesn’t want us to live in a Trump-style country.
I understand that. He doesn’t want borders. He doesn’t want economic growth. He doesn’t want men taken out of women’s sport. Honestly, I really don’t think we should take anything he said seriously.
Here is Peter Walker’s story about the Davey speech yesterday.
And here is Rafael Behr’s column about the party.
Farage declines to back UK public health leaders who say Trump wrong to claim link between paracetamol and autism
Nigel Farage, the Reform UK leader, has declined to back UK medical leaders who say that Donald Trump was wrong to link paracetamol to autism.
In an interview on LBC, Farage claimed that he had “no idea” whether or not the president was right when said that taking paracetamol during a pregnancy could lead to a child having autism.
Trump’s claim has been widely dismissed as unfounded, or even dangerous, by public health organisations and experts around the world.
Yesterday the Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory Agency in the UK said:
There is no evidence that taking paracetamol during pregnancy causes autism in children.Paracetamol remains the recommended pain relief option for pregnant women when used as directed.
But, when Farage was asked by LBC’s Nick Ferrari if he thought Trump’s comments were right, he replied:
I have no idea … you know, we were told thalidomide was a very safe drug and it wasn’t. Who knows? Nick, I don’t know, you don’t know.
He [Trump] has a particular thing about autism, I think because there’s been some in his family, he feels it very personally. I have no idea.
Asked if he would side with medical experts on this issue, Farage replied:
When it comes to science, I don’t side with anybody. I don’t side with anybody because science is never settled, and we should remember that.
Farage’s reference to thalidomide will be seen as scaremongering. Thalidomide was sold as a sedative in the late 1950s, but it was quickly linked to birth defects and withdrawn from general sale after about four years. Paracetamol has been in use for around 70 years, and repeated studies have said that that it is safe for pregnant women.
Farage has adopted a similar position in the past on global warming – refusing to accept the overwhelming expert consensus that climate change is real, on the grounds that the science is disputed.
He is also normally reluctant to criticise Trump, whom he counts as a friend and who’s anti-immigration nationalist populism is aligned to Reform UK’s.
But, in the LBC interview, Farage did not endorse what Trump claimed about sharia law being established in London.
Farage said the president should be taken seriously, but not literally. He went on:
Is [Trump] right to say that sharia is an issue in London? Yes. Is it an overwhelming issue at this stage? No.
McFadden tactfully says Trump wrong about sharia law in London, calling comment ‘misreading of our great capital’
In his interviews this morning Pat McFadden, the work and pensions secretary, also dismissed Donald Trump’s false claim yesterday that Sadiq Khan is introducing sharia law in London, where he is the Labour mayor.
Some Labour MPs have reacted very angrily to the claim, which Trump made in the course of a provacative and rambling speech to the United Nations, accusing the president of Islamophobia.
But McFadden dismissed it more diplomatically, almost laughing it off.
Asked on BBC Breakfast what he thought of Trump’s sharia law claim, McFadden replied:
Well, I’m here at Selhurst Park in south London where we don’t have sharia law, we have British law.
It’s a great capital city that we have. I think it’s a great asset to the UK. And I’m afraid I differ from the president on that.
McFadden also said Trump had had “a good state visit”.
Asked again about the sharia law claim, McFadden said:
I just think it’s a misreading of our great capital city.
In a separate interview with Times Radio, McFadden said Trump and Khan had “had a beef for some years”.
Last night Emily Thornberry, the chair of the Commons foreign affairs committee, joined those Labour MPs condemning Trump more robustly over this. She posted this on social media.
I’ve known @SadiqKhan for over 30 yrs. He’s a feminist, a socialist & an LGBTQ+ ally. I’m so proud he’s our London mayor. For the record, he’s as interested in introducing Sharia Law to London as I am – ie 0%. Those who suggest otherwise are deluded, or have a v sinister agenda.
Pat McFadden dismisses Tory claims that Morgan McSweeney misled elections watchdog
Good morning. Pat McFadden has been on media round duties this morning. He is now work and pensions secreratary, and his interviews (conducted from Selhurst Park) were ostensibly about an announcement about premier league football clubs getting involved in a £25m expansion of the youth hubs programme.
In his old job, as chancellor of the duchy of Lancaster, McFadden was in effect the “minister for the Today programme”, the No 10 figure sent out to hose down the media in the face of assorted scandals and problems and there was quite a bit of that going on this morning. He was asked about Donald Trump’s latest outburst. And he was asked about the Conservative allegations that Morgan McSweeney, the PM’s chief of staff, mislead the elections watchdog over donations to a Labour thinktank when the party was in opposition.
The Tories have been banging away at this for some days, and last night they escalated this, publishing a leaked email from a Labour lawyer to McSweeney implying that McSweeney was advised not to tell the Electoral Commission the full reasons why donations were not declared. The Daily Mail has splashed the story. Here is our version, by Pippa Crerar.
The story has not achieved mega lift-off – BBC Breakfast did not even ask McFadden about it – but on Times Radio he was asked if he had confidence in McSweeney, and McFadden replied:
Yes, I do. I worked with him very closely on the election campaign. He’s a person of enormous talent.
And on the Today programme McFadden was asked if he was 100% sure that McSweeney had done nothing wrong. McFadden replied:
The Electoral Commission made a statement on this last night, and they said that they’d looked into all these things some years ago and they really didn’t have anything to add to it.
Look, I’m not surprised that the Conservatives are trying to, attack someone who was very effective, who was an integral part of Labour’s general election campaign last year in delivering the Labour victory. And they don’t happen very often; they don’t fall from the sky. They require talented people to work on them. He did that, and he did it in a very effective way.
Asked again if he was convinced that McSweeney did nothing criminally wrong, McFadden said:
Look, I think the Electoral Commission have looked into that. They’ve said there is nothing to add here. They are the people actually charged with policing the rules around declarations to nations and all the rest of that. And they looked into this as far back, I think, as 2021.
I will post more from McFadden’s interviews shortly.
The Commons is in recess, and Labour and the Conservatives are both preparing for their party conferences. Labour’s starts this weekend, and the Tories’ the week after. The political diary looks quite empty, but the news never stops, so something will come up.
If you want to contact me, please post a message below the line when comments are open (normally between 10am and 3pm BST at the moment), or message me on social media. I can’t read all the messages BTL, but if you put “Andrew” in a message aimed at me, I am more likely to see it because I search for posts containing that word.
If you want to flag something up urgently, it is best to use social media. You can reach me on Bluesky at @andrewsparrowgdn.bsky.social. The Guardian has given up posting from its official accounts on X, but individual Guardian journalists are there, I still have my account, and if you message me there at @AndrewSparrow, I will see it and respond if necessary.
I find it very helpful when readers point out mistakes, even minor typos. No error is too small to correct. And I find your questions very interesting too. I can’t promise to reply to them all, but I will try to reply to as many as I can, either BTL or sometimes in the blog.
#Andy #Burnham #Britain #wholesale #change #Labour #MPs #prepare #conference #politics #live #Politics
