Prosecution says no evidence Patterson had ‘innocent’ interest in foraging mushrooms

Crown prosecutor Jeremy McWilliams is arguing against Patterson’s third ground of appeal.

On this ground, Patterson’s legal team argue the trial judge, Justice Christopher Beale, erred in ruling that photos and videos related to mushrooms and found on an SD card in Patterson’s home was inadmissible.

Patterson’s lawyers said the photos from 2020 tended to support her evidence that she had a tendency to forage for mushrooms, which included picking and eating them. They argue the ruling meant she was forced to testify about the photos and hence was denied her right to silence as a defendant.

But McWilliams said none of the photographs had the “hallmarks of culinary use”.

He said some of the photographed mushrooms looked “raggedy”.

He says there is no evidence that Patterson had an “innocent” interest in foraging wild mushrooms.

Share

Updated at 

Key events

Prosecution addresses Patterson’s claim of miscarriage of justice

McWilliams has turned to Patterson’s sixth ground of appeal – that prosecutor Nanette Rogers SC’s closing address caused a substantial miscarriage of justice. Patterson’s legal team has outlined 35 occasions where they argue Rogers misstated the evidence.

McWilliams says none of the 35 points has any substance. He says 20 of the points were not raised during the trial while five were raised “significantly after” the prosecutor’s closing address.

Share

Updated at 

#Erin #Patterson #appeal #live #prosecutors #seek #life #prison #parole #triple #murderer #Erin #Patterson #mushroom #trial